Waldron v. Waldron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “oral evidence cannot be received to explain the intent [of the testator], except as it may bring before the court such circumstances surrounding the making of the will as may be necessary to an understanding of the terms employed”
• “oral evidence cannot be received to explain the intent [of the testator], except as it may bring before the court such circumstances surrounding the making of the will as may be necessary to an understanding of the terms employed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Borden v. Fletcher's Estate
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1902-06-24· cited 22×
• Nageli v. McMorris
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1910-11-11· cited 20×
• In re Reimers
  New York Surrogate's Court· 1929-09-04· cited 10×
• Knowles v. Nat. Bank of Detroit
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1956-05-14· cited 9×
• In re Quinn's Estate
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1914-03-26· cited 9×
• In Re Parker Estate
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-05-27· cited 2×
• Goff v. Cass Circuit Judge
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1908-03-31· cited 2×
• Bachinski v. Bachinski's Estate
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1908-05-26· cited 2×
• Squiers v. Parker
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-05-27· cited 1×
• Sidorski v. Leppak
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1923-03-22

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Toms v. Williams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1879-10-14· cited 58×