Waldron v. Turpin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the cases in which there have been relatively lengthy gaps between the protected activity and the adverse employment action, however, there has generally been other evidence to suggest retaliation.”
• first quoting Lundy v. Catholic Health Sys. of Long Isl. Inc., 711 F.3d 106, 117 (2d Cir. 2013) and then citing Brzak v. United Nations, 597 F.3d 107, 113–14 (2d Cir. 2010)
• “The lack of a bright-line rule has allowed the Second Circuit ‘to exercise its judgment about the permissible inferences that can be drawn from temporal proximity in the context of particular cases.’ In Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co., 895 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1990

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).