Waldron v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that if the defendant “has paid its contractor . . . for those appliances, then the enrichment, in the absence of fraud, has not been unjust”
• finding that if the defendant “has paid its contractor . . . for those appliances, then the enrichment, in the absence of fraud, has not been unjust”
• rejecting unjust enrichment claim by subcontractor against the owner because the owner had paid its general contractor
• if defendant has paid general contractor, enrichment not unjust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).