Waldrip v. General Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that occasional flare-ups of plaintiffs chronic pancreatitis which required him to miss work did not qualify as a disability
• holding that evidence of temporary effects of pancreatitis did not amount to proof of an impairment that substantially limited a major life activity
• holding that evidence of temporary effects of pancreatitis did not amount to proof of an impairment that substantially limited a major life activity
• suggesting that EEOC regulations interpreting §§ 12111 and 12112 of the ADA are entitled to Chevron deference
• holding evidence did not raise a fact issue as to whether employer regarded employee as having a physical or mental impairment that and substantially limited the major life activity
• holding evidence did not raise a fact issue as to whether employer regarded employee as having a physical or mental impairment that and substantially limited the major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).