Waldman v. New Chapter, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying New York law and dismissing breach of contract claim based on misleading label where no allegations suggested privity
• upholding unjust enrichment claim against product manufacturer where plaintiff indirectly conferred a benefit to product manufacturer by purchasing product from retailer
• \New York law recognizes that a statement can be materially misleading without being a material misrepresentation.\ (citation omitted)
• “Defendant accurately describes New York law in 1997, as the S.D.N.Y. understood it. But this is not the law today, as promulgated by New York’s own courts.”
• “Plaintiff pleads nothing to suggest that she, or other class members, cared about [the packaged food product’s] density.”
• analyzing N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 350-a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).