Skip to main content
· 11/6/2008

Waldman v. Maini

Citations

  • 195 P.3d 850
  • 124 Nev. 1121
  • 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 93
  • 2008 Nev. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a court will only disturb factual findings if they are not supported by substantial evidence
  • explaining that constructive trust can be a remedy to redress fraud and unjust enrichment
  • providing that issues of statutory interpretation are legal questions reviewed de novo
  • providing that issues of statutory interpretation are legal questions reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Gibbons, Maupin, Parraguirre, Douglas, Saitta, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.