Waldman, H. v. Boro of Fox Chapel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Montana had failed adequately to supervise its state regulatory policy because “a rate filing became effective despite the failure of the rating bureau to provide additional requested information”
• explaining that Parker protection has been extended to private persons who are sufficiently cloaked in the state’s authority
• stating that the Supreme Court had been, and would be, “adhering in most cases to fundamental and accepted assumptions about the benefits of competition within the framework of the antitrust laws”
• looking to the state statutes authorizing insurance companies to establish joint rates for its members
• applying the state action analysis in a case arising only under the FTC Act
• depending upon type of regulation, state may provide comprehensive supervision without complete control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).