Walden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unexplained possession of recently stolen property raises an inference sufficient to prove theft, but not receiving stolen property
• tracing the theft act and interpretive case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gibson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-11-28· cited 32×
• J.B. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-03· cited 18×
• Simmons v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-02-10· cited 16×
• Hunt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-10-21· cited 6×
• Byrd v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 5×
• Gibson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-11-15· cited 4×
• Butcher v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-08-11· cited 3×
• JB v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-03

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Elmore v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-11-08· cited 233×
• Nash v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-04-07· cited 33×
• Choate v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 27×
• Green v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1953-11-10· cited 25×
• Coates v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1967-09-19· cited 22×
• Elmore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-05-01· cited 21×
• Adkins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-01-05· cited 20×
• Maynard v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-06-17· cited 19×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-11-24· cited 16×
• Lawrence v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-04-04· cited 13×
• Green v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-05-17· cited 13×
• Atkins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-11-20· cited 6×