Skip to main content
· 4/19/2012

Wald v. Bank of America Corp.

Citations

  • 856 F. Supp. 2d 545
  • 2013 WL 4009791
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that where neither the RFC nor the hypothetical specifies that the sit/stand option is “at will” or designates the frequency with which the claimant must alternate between sitting and standing, remand is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vitaliano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.