Walcott v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the Government’s argument that an alien’s “March 1996 conviction was not deemed final for immigration purposes until July 1, 1998, when direct appellate review of it was exhausted”
• accepting the DHS’s argument that an alien’s “March 1996 conviction was not deemed final for immigration purposes until July 1, 1998, when direct appellate review of it was exhausted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).