Skip to main content
· 10/29/1985

Walcon Corp. v. D.J. MacKenzie Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 620 F. Supp. 89
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the claimant defeated the United States’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the United States’ eighteen-month delay in instituting civil forfeiture proceedings was sufficient to raise due process concerns
  • The Court stated there was an issue as to “whether claimant is entitled to the additional relief requested in his counterclaim” and then directed the parties to file cross motions addressing the issue.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.