Walch v. Adjutant General's Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that reference to technician’s “civilian status [was] an introduction to provisions primarily concerned with the annual requests to Congress for authorizing specific numbers of technician positions”
• finding “[t]he Rule 12(b)(6) analysis is generally confined to a review of the complaint and its proper attachments
• considering “only two” of several documents a plaintiff attached to a Rule 12(b)(6) response, as “both were sufficiently referenced in the complaint to permit their consideration”
• affirming judgment in which the district court relied in part on documents attached to the plaintiff's response to a motion to dismiss in deciding that motion
• distinguishing a dual status technician’s “full-time civilian position with the [National] Guard, a Monday through Friday job . . . as a ‘federal technician’” from his “traditional National Guard position”
• relying on letters—i.e., entire documents—that were “sufficiently referenced in the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).