· 5/17/2000
Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated Associates' Health and Welfare Plan and Administrative Committee, Administrator of the Plan v. Denise Wells
Citations
- 213 F.3d 398
- 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1673
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715
- 2000 WL 631028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that free riding on attorney’s efforts would be “contrary to the equitable concept of ‘common fund’ ”
- describing as “clearly wrongful” the action of a beneficiary’s attorney in actual possession of the disputed funds who diminishes the disputed funds by paying himself
- describing as “clearly wrongful” the action of a beneficiary’s attorney in actual possession of the disputed funds who diminishes the disputed funds by paying himself
- suggesting that in an action under § 502(a)(3
- declining to defer to an administrator's interpretation of a subrogation provision where \there is no reference to discretion in the part of the plan documents that deals with the plan's right to reimbursement\
- suggesting that in an action under § 502(a)(3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Diane, Easterbrook, Posner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.