Skip to main content
· 5/17/2000

Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated Associates' Health and Welfare Plan and Administrative Committee, Administrator of the Plan v. Denise Wells

Citations

  • 213 F.3d 398
  • 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1673
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715
  • 2000 WL 631028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that free riding on attorney’s efforts would be “contrary to the equitable concept of ‘common fund’ ”
  • describing as “clearly wrongful” the action of a beneficiary’s attorney in actual possession of the disputed funds who diminishes the disputed funds by paying himself
  • describing as “clearly wrongful” the action of a beneficiary’s attorney in actual possession of the disputed funds who diminishes the disputed funds by paying himself
  • suggesting that in an action under § 502(a)(3
  • declining to defer to an administrator's interpretation of a subrogation provision where \there is no reference to discretion in the part of the plan documents that deals with the plan's right to reimbursement\
  • suggesting that in an action under § 502(a)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Diane, Easterbrook, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.