Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that party had, “by its silence in reply” brief, “abandoned” an argument raised in its opening brief
• noting that the moving party had, “by its silence in reply” had “abandoned [an] argument” raised in its opening brief
• holding a repeat citation was warranted for a second violation of the same standard at a different store because they were owned by the same corporation
• construing moving party’s “silence in reply” brief as indication that party had “abandoned [its initial] argument”
• construing moving party’s “silence in reply” brief as an indication that the party had “abandoned [its initial] argument”
• construing moving party’s “silence” in reply brief as an indication that the party had “abandoned [its initial] argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).