Skip to main content
· 8/26/1999

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. McKenzie

Citations

  • 997 S.W.2d 278
  • 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1141
  • 1999 Tex. LEXIS 104
  • 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1153
  • 1999 WL 645102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • raising statutory exemption for exemplary damages in response to motion for judgment on the verdict sufficient to preserve error
  • to preserve a complaint, a party must present a timely request, motion, or objection to the trial court
  • “Whether a particular remedy is available under a statute is a question of law for the court.”
  • “To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must present to the trial court a timely request, motion, or objection, state the specific grounds therefore, and obtain a ruling.”
  • “To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must present to the trial court a timely request, motion, or objection, state the specific grounds therefore, and obtain a ruling.”
  • A To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must present to the trial court a timely request, motion, or objection, state the specific grounds therefore, and obtain a ruling. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.