Skip to main content
· 7/23/2014

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEW

Citations

  • 95 A.3d 1264
  • 2014 WL 3638848
  • 2014 Del. LEXIS 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The term ‘rifled precision’ requires the Court of Chancery to make a qualitative analysis of documents demanded. ‘Rifled precision’ is not a quantitative limitation on the stockholder’s right to obtain all documents that are necessary and essential to a proper purpose.”
  • affirming production of documents from officers and employees
  • discussing the “necessary and essential” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Berger, Ridgely, Butler, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.