Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Deggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court erred in upholding directed verdict against Wal-Mart based on co-defendant’s deemed admissions
• party relying on deemed admissions not unduly prejudiced by withdrawal of admissions when she had deposed withdrawing party
• “At trial, Deggs’s counsel read the deemed admissions to the jury and told the jury that these matters were conclusively established.”
• party relying on deemed admissions not unduly prejudiced by withdrawal of admissions when she had deposed withdrawing party
• good cause shown when Wal-Mart did not receive requests directed to employee and immediately moved to withdraw the deemed admissions upon learning that employee had failed to respond
• good cause shown when Wal-Mart did not receive requests directed to employee and immediately moved to withdraw the deemed admissions upon learning that employee had failed to respond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).