Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central Point

Citations

  • 144 P.3d 914
  • 341 Or. 393
  • 2006 Ore. LEXIS 924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction over petition for judicial review of Land Use Board of Appeals order when petitioner had served petition by first-class mail, rather than by certified or registered mail as prescribed by statute.”
  • referring to Black’s Law Dictionary to determine the well-established legal meaning of the term “service”
  • “[I]n McCall, this court held that the section describing the procedure for accomplishing service, ORS 19.500, also set forth a jurisdictional requirement.” (Footnote omitted.)
  • prior case law interpreting statute considered in first step of PGE analysis
  • prior case law interpreting statute considered in first step of analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.