· 9/28/2006
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central Point
Citations
- 144 P.3d 914
- 341 Or. 393
- 2006 Ore. LEXIS 924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “that Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction over petition for judicial review of Land Use Board of Appeals order when petitioner had served petition by first-class mail, rather than by certified or registered mail as prescribed by statute.”
- referring to Black’s Law Dictionary to determine the well-established legal meaning of the term “service”
- “[I]n McCall, this court held that the section describing the procedure for accomplishing service, ORS 19.500, also set forth a jurisdictional requirement.” (Footnote omitted.)
- prior case law interpreting statute considered in first step of PGE analysis
- prior case law interpreting statute considered in first step of analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.