Skip to main content
· 5/15/2007

Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 731 N.W.2d 154
  • 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20130
  • 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 60
  • 2007 WL 1412884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the odor from pig manure was unambiguously a pollutant
  • holding that the odor from pig manure was unambiguously a pollutant
  • holding that the odor from pig manure was unambiguously a pollutant
  • holding that the odor from pig manure was unambiguously a pollutant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudson, Randall, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.