Wajilam Exports (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ATL Shipping Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss when complaint alleged a regular practice of diverting and commingling funds, supported by an affidavit alleging that funds were always diverted to the dominant company
• declining to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment where discovery had not begun
• declining to exercise discretion to convert motion to dismiss into motion for summary judgment because “[d]iscovery has not begun yet”
• applying a “reasonable grounds” standard when assessing the Aqua Stoli factors
• “There would be little point in considering a summary judgment motion when significant relevant facts may yet be discovered.”
• “There would be little point in considering a summary judgment motion when significant relevant facts may yet be discovered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).