Skip to main content
· 9/10/2002

Wajda v. Kingsbury

Citations

  • 652 N.W.2d 856
  • 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1039
  • 2002 WL 31012953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • validating spoliation sanction permitting jury to infer that the evidence the defendant lost or destroyed was favorable to the plaintiff
  • validating spoliation sanction permitting jury to infer that the evidence the defendant lost or destroyed was favorable to the plaintiff
  • addressing destruction of tapes under the exclusive control of an adverse party
  • \ Patton applies to any case where critical evidence has been destroyed.\
  • “Patton applies to any case where critical evidence has been destroyed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stoneburner, Toussaint, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.