· 9/10/2002
Wajda v. Kingsbury
Citations
- 652 N.W.2d 856
- 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1039
- 2002 WL 31012953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- validating spoliation sanction permitting jury to infer that the evidence the defendant lost or destroyed was favorable to the plaintiff
- validating spoliation sanction permitting jury to infer that the evidence the defendant lost or destroyed was favorable to the plaintiff
- addressing destruction of tapes under the exclusive control of an adverse party
- \ Patton applies to any case where critical evidence has been destroyed.\
- “Patton applies to any case where critical evidence has been destroyed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stoneburner, Toussaint, Schumacher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.