· 6/1/1936
Waite v. Meeske
Citations
- 84 F.2d 1020
- 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld\ where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
- holding that a party cannot wait until after summary judgment is granted to move for sanctions under Rule 11
- holding that “[a]n award of sanctions under . . . the court’s inherent authority 27 requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
- holding that “[a]n award of sanctions 20 under . . . the court’s inherent authority requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
- holding that “[a]n award of sanctions 18 under . . . the court’s inherent authority requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
- holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.