Skip to main content
· 6/1/1936

Waite v. Meeske

Citations

  • 84 F.2d 1020
  • 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld\ where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
  • holding that a party cannot wait until after summary judgment is granted to move for sanctions under Rule 11
  • holding that “[a]n award of sanctions under . . . the court’s inherent authority 27 requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
  • holding that “[a]n award of sanctions 20 under . . . the court’s inherent authority requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
  • holding that “[a]n award of sanctions 18 under . . . the court’s inherent authority requires a finding of recklessness or bad faith”
  • holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.