Waite v. Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of, among other things a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and inconsistent statements, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
• concluding that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of, among other things a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and inconsistent statements, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
• conclud- ing that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and a suspicious bill of sale, among other things, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
• conclud- ing that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and a suspicious bill of sale, among other things, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).