District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/14/2008
Wainwright v. State
Citations
- 983 So. 2d 635
- 2008 WL 2038275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- existence of conditional release was not a newly discovered fact justifying untimely postcon-viction motion attacking voluntariness of 1990 plea
- existence of conditional release was not a newly discovered fact justifying untimely postconviction motion attacking voluntariness of 1990 plea
- fact in existence at time of plea was not “newly discovered” for purposes of exception to two-year time limit found in rule 3.850(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-20· cited 69×
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-20· cited 44×
- Dwyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-14· cited 10×
- McFadden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-08· cited 8×
- Beasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 7×
- Boykins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.