Wainscot v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff knew that her future benefits “were affected by the hearing officer’s determination,” and thus “her motivation to appeal the determination was plainly established by the agency’s denial of the 1995 deductions”
• recipient had a full and fair opportunity to be heard before a hearing officer acting in a judicial capacity in a formal administrative proceeding, thus a preclusive effect must be given to the state agency's determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).