Skip to main content
· 12/12/1991

Wahl Instruments, Inc. And Robert Parker v. Acvious, Inc. And Kenneth J. McMillan

Citations

  • 950 F.2d 1575
  • 21 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1123
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28947
  • 1991 WL 261943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a \step or source or technique considered 'best' in a manufacturing circumstance may have been selected for a non-'best mode' reason\
  • explaining that a \step or source or technique considered 'best' in a manufacturing circumstance may have been selected for a non-'best mode' reason\
  • no violation of best mode where inventor concealed more cost-effective method to manufacture claimed device
  • “How to mass produce the device is not, however, a best mode of [the] invention or part of what [was] invented.”
  • no best mode violation where embedment molding did not affect how invention worked and inventor made own inserts rather than purchase them on the basis of cost considerations
  • “The purpose of the best mode requirement is to restrain inventors from applying for a patent while at the same time concealing from the public preferred embodiments of their inventions which they have in fact conceived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Archer, Kelleher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.