Skip to main content
· 6/26/2012

Wahid v. Gates

Citations

  • 876 F. Supp. 2d 15
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87865
  • 2012 WL 2389984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the petitioner conceded the new procedures amounted to a “marginal improvement” over those at issue in Al Maqaleh II
  • rejecting petitioner’s request for jurisdictional discovery, finding that such discovery “would not alter this Court’s jurisdictional analysis”
  • finding Bagram was situated in a “highly active warzone”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James S. Gwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.