Skip to main content
· 3/1/1998

Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Citations

  • 994 F. Supp. 237
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2551
  • 1998 WL 99625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state constitutional action cannot lie when § 1983 provides an alternative remedy for the plaintiff
  • noting that “the existence of alternative damage remedies under Section 1983 obviates the need to imply a private right of action under the State Due Process Clause”
  • denying recovery under state constitution’s due process clause where plaintiff has alternative remedy under § 1983
  • “Section 1983 need not provide the exact same standard of relief in order to provide an adequate remedy”
  • a state constitutional action is obviated when alternative damages remedies exist pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
  • “Section 1983 need not provide the exact same standard of relief in order to provide an adequate remedy that would vindicate Plaintiff’s due process claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.