Wagner v. Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Florida law despite parties’ agreement that California law would govern because, now that the parties and their children live in Florida, Florida is the only state with a legitimate interest in dispute
• “when an ambiguity exists and the parties’ intent can be resolved only by resort to conflicting extrinsic evidence, a question of fact is presented, which must be resolved by the trier of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Scott
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-06-03· cited 16×
• Wheeler v. WHEELER, ERWIN & FOUNTAIN, PA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-14· cited 15×
• Riera v. Riera
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-25· cited 11×
• Weisfeld-Ladd v. Estate of Ladd
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-01· cited 10×
• Schmachtenberg v. Schmachtenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 8×
• Torwest, Inc. v. Killilea
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-06· cited 6×
• Marr v. Webb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-03· cited 6×
• Horowitch v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2007-09-17· cited 1×
• Skopelos Seafood & Steak Restaurant, Inc. v. Estate of Silivos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-21
• Onewest Bank v. Palmero
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-24
• Klazkin v. Richman-Klazkin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wolf v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-02-19· cited 142×
• City of El Cajon v. El Cajon Police Officers' Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-08-14· cited 68×
• Centennial Mortg., Inc. v. SG/SC, LTD.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-26· cited 28×
• In Re Marriage of Crosby & Grooms
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-02-26· cited 25×
• In Re Marriage of Benjamins
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-06-29· cited 21×
• Zern v. Zern
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-29· cited 3×
• Rothstein v. Honeywell, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-15· cited 3×