Skip to main content
· 10/13/1913

Wagner v. Hamer

Citations

  • 55 Pa. Super. 172
  • 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 336

Syllabus

<p>Trespass — Wrongful cutting of timber — Conflicting evidence — Case for jury.</p> <p>In an action to recover damages for the wrongful cutting of timber where the determination of controlling questions of whether the title and possession of the land in dispute were in the plaintiff or defendants, depends upon questions of fact to be found from both documentary and oral testimony, the case is for the jury and a verdict and judgment for the defendants will be decisive.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.