Wagner v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument was preserved for appeal because the evidence presented, the nature of the motion, and the legal sources cited made the trial court “well aware of the issue before it” (quoting State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 343, 15 P3d 22 (2000))
• trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of DUII obtained following an unlawful stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).