Wagner v. Conried

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a request to inspect personally-owned devices of defendant’s employees in part because “the Court [had] significant concerns regarding the intrusiveness of the request and the privacy rights of the individuals to be affected”
• “The number of sampled surgeries would eventually depend on [Dr. Khoury]’s further analysis of the metadata[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).