Wagner v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that RCr 5.16(3) and interpretive case law arise in the context of pretrial discovery and do not alter the standards applicable to post- conviction discovery requests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haight v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 87×
• Commonwealth v. Bussell
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 49×
• Mills v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 33×
• Sanders v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-06-13· cited 18×
• Page v. City of Louisville
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-12-24· cited 8×