Wagner v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting evidence that contradicted, rather than explained, a written agreement by stating “[t]he problem with [the plaintiffs] extrinsic evidence is that it does not explain the contract language, it contradicts it.”
• rejecting evidence that contradicted, rather than explained, a written agreement by stating “[t]he problem with [the plaintiffs] extrinsic evidence is that it does not explain the contract language, it contradicts it.”
• extrinsic evidence not credible because “it does not explain the contract language, it contradicts it.”
• extrinsic evidence 11 not credible because “it does not explain the contract language, it contradicts it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).