Wagner v. Anzon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no negligence per se claim based upon violation of Philadelphia Air Management Code, because “the purpose of the Code was to protect the ‘atmosphere over the City 1 of Philadelphia, with ... concomitant benefits to its ‘inhabitants.’ ”
• holding that there was no negligence per se claim based upon violation of Philadelphia Air Management Code, because “the purpose of the Code was to protect the ‘atmosphere over the City’ of Philadelphia, with … concomitant benefits to its ‘inhabitants.’”
• in turn quoting Contractors Lumber and Supply Company v. Quinette, 126 A.2d 442, 444 (Pa. 1956)
• trial court properly instructed jury that defendant could be hable if its action was not the sole cause of the plaintiffs’ injuries, but not if defendant’s negligent act was an insignificant factor of those injuries
• trial court properly instructed jury that defendant could be liable if its action was not the sole cause of the plaintiffs' injuries, but not if defendant's negligent act was an insignificant factor of those injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).