WAGNER, DANIELLE v. PLOCH, ROBERT A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts will not “construe the [administrative] charge to include facts that were initially omitted”
• finding that a charge alleging discrimination based on “sex” did not put the employer “on notice of the existence and nature of [plaintiff’s] sexual harassment hostile work environment claim as alleged in her petition”
• “A vague or circumscribed EEOC charge cannot satisfy the exhaustion requirement for claims it does not fairly embrace.”
• “[Plaintiff’s] claims may include those stated in her charge and factually related claims that could reasonably be expected to fall within the agency’s investigation of the claims stated in the charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).