Waggoner v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• language of Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 215(A) must be construed in conjunction with the language of two preceding sections
• “[T]his court favors the interpretation of a forfeiture provision in a contract, where damages are difficult to determine, to be one for liquidated damages and not a penalty.”
• “[Tjhis court favors the interpretation of a forfeiture provision in a contract, where damages are difficult to determine, to be one for liquidated damages and not a penalty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).