Waggoner v. Flack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering failure to pay interest a valid basis for breach-of-contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
  California Supreme Court· 1947-06-26· cited 218×
• Palm Beach Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Strong
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-07-10· cited 48×
• United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California
  S.D. California· 1937-12-04· cited 31×
• Portland Savings Bank v. Landry
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1977-04-21· cited 22×
• Hooter v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-02-19· cited 13×
• Hirsh v. Block
  District of Columbia· 1920-06-02· cited 13×
• Drainage Dist. No. 2 of Crittenden County v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis
  Eighth Circuit· 1934-02-08· cited 9×
• United States ex rel. Midwest Steel & Iron Works Co. v. Henly
  D. Idaho· 1954-01-04· cited 9×
• Kelly v. Allen
  Ninth Circuit· 1931-05-18· cited 8×
• OUACHITA NAT. BANK IN MONROE v. Rowan
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-04-25· cited 7×
• In Re Suarez
  S.D. Florida· 1991-05-01· cited 6×
• Duke Energy International Peru Investments No. 1 Ltd. v. Republic of Peru
  District of Columbia· 2012-09-14· cited 6×
• Rieger v. Wilson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1936-03-21· cited 6×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Culbertson v. Blanchard
  Texas Supreme Court· 1891-02-17· cited 66×
• Waggoner v. Flack
  Supreme Court· 1902-01-30· cited 24×