Skip to main content
· 5/1/1997

Wages v. Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co.

Citations

  • 937 P.2d 715
  • 188 Ariz. 525
  • 242 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing alleged bias where the arbitrator had previously worked as an attorney for the parties who had litigated similar claims against the defendant
  • “The various federal and state courts that have addressed ‘evident partiality’ have struggled with the concept.”
  • various federal and state courts have struggled with the concept, and relevant statutes do not provide a definition
  • where ample evidence of partiality exists, panel’s striking of defendant’s defense further evidence of such partiality
  • party could challenge arbitrator’s bias after entry of award when prior to arbitration arbitrator did not disclose his litigation against party’s predecessor in interest on a similar issue
  • “After examining the totality of the circumstances . . . we find that a reasonable person could indeed conclude that [arbitrator] was partial to [plaintiff] . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Megregor, Kleinschmidt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.