· 5/1/1997
Wages v. Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co.
Citations
- 937 P.2d 715
- 188 Ariz. 525
- 242 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing alleged bias where the arbitrator had previously worked as an attorney for the parties who had litigated similar claims against the defendant
- “The various federal and state courts that have addressed ‘evident partiality’ have struggled with the concept.”
- various federal and state courts have struggled with the concept, and relevant statutes do not provide a definition
- where ample evidence of partiality exists, panel’s striking of defendant’s defense further evidence of such partiality
- party could challenge arbitrator’s bias after entry of award when prior to arbitration arbitrator did not disclose his litigation against party’s predecessor in interest on a similar issue
- “After examining the totality of the circumstances . . . we find that a reasonable person could indeed conclude that [arbitrator] was partial to [plaintiff] . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Megregor, Kleinschmidt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.