Wagenstein v. Shwarts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a contract implied in fact” has “substantially the same terms and conditions as embodied in the expired written contract”
• noting that express contract and implied-in-fact contract theories are mutually exclusive
• finding parties created contract implied in fact where “defendant continued to provide services to plaintiff and plaintiff continued to pay for those services in the manner provided for in the expired contract”
• implied-in-fact contract existed from September 1986 to September 1988

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).