Skip to main content
· 12/11/1996

Wadsworth, Inc. v. Schwarz-Nin

Citations

  • 951 F. Supp. 314
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19397
  • 1996 WL 754249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[wjhere the directors or officers use the corporation to commit fraud, courts will ‘pierce the corporate veil’ and hold those officers or directors personally liable.”
  • \[T]he unreasonableness of the plaintiff's reliance may be regarded as sufficient evidence that he did not in fact rely upon the claimed false representation.\
  • “[W]hen an officer is accused of committing a tort, even if in her capacity as a corporate officer, the doctrine of piercing may not even be implicated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pieras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.