Skip to main content
· 10/24/1985

Wade v. Union National Bank

Citations

  • 10 Kan. App. 2d 645
  • 707 P.2d 1087
  • 1985 Kan. App. LEXIS 965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming lower court’s striking entire response but noting approach was not “useful for purposes of the complex factual analysis this case requires”
  • affirming lower court’s striking entire response as not an abuse of discretion but criticizing court’s approach as not “useful for purposes of the complex factual analysis this case requires”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Bullock, Woleslagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.