Skip to main content

Wade v. State

Citations

  • 701 S.E.2d 214
  • 305 Ga. App. 819
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2894
  • 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant a party to the crime of possession of cocaine where he drove his nephew to certain location for the purpose of purchasing drugs
  • “the mere fact that [defendant] testified he had no knowledge of the drugs did not require the jury to acquit him”
  • “the mere fact that [defendant] testified he had no knowledge of the drugs did not require the jury to acquit him”
  • evidence sufficient to support conviction as a party to the crime of possession of cocaine where defendant drove his nephew to location for purpose ofpurchasing drugs
  • “[a]s long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State’s case, the jury’s verdict will be upheld”
  • in determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we consider not only the evidence presented at trial, but also the logical inferences that can be derived from that evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, Barnes, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.