Skip to main content

Wade v. State

Citations

  • 166 So. 2d 739
  • 42 Ala. App. 400
  • 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the Court of Appeals held that 'where the same transaction supports both grand larceny and burglary, on conviction there can be but one punishment'
  • the Court of Appeals held that ‘where the same transaction supports both grand larceny and burglary, on conviction there can be but one punishment’
  • the Court of Appeals held that ‘where the same transaction supports both grand larceny [now theft] and burglary, on conviction there can be but one punishment’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cates, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.