Wade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Florida Sexual Predator Act does not apply to offenses occurring before October 1, 1993, the act's effective date
• holding that the Florida Sexual Predators Act does not apply to offenses occurring before October 1, 1993, the act’s effective date
• “Because Wade’s offenses were committed prior to October 1, 1993, we conclude that he did not meet the criteria for a sexual predator designation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 23×
• Nicholson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-06· cited 16×
• Lowery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-31· cited 3×
• Dennis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-31· cited 2×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 1×
• RICHARD ALBERT ROBERTS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04· cited 1×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-14· cited 1×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Angell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-29· cited 17×
• Burkett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-08· cited 9×
• Harrell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-10· cited 1×