Wade v. De Witt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, aside from the erroneously admitted evidence, the “plaintiff’s proof was quite thin in establishing the negligence of defendant and required a finder of fact to rely upon, for the most part, inferences to be deduced from the circumstantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).