Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Board erred in assigning greater weight to physician’s opinion where his findings were not supported by record, and he failed to consider relevant evidence
• applying manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard in reviewing whether the evidence supported a pension board’s ruling on line-of-duty disability pension application
• applying a manifest weight standard to the issue of whether the evidence supported the Board's denial of a disability pension
• reversing denial of duty disability benefit where pension board gave greater weight to opinion of doctor who provided no factual basis for his conclusion that injuries were preexisting
• finding it \incomprehensible\ that Board would credit the opinion of a doctor who made multiple misstatements of the evidence and whose opinion was contradicted by five other doctors
• applying a manifest weight of the evidence standard to the question of whether the evidence of record supported the board’s denial of an officer’s application for a disability pension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).