Wade v. Autoland, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implied permission depends upon whether named insured could reasonably foresee that initial permittee would allow third party to use car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual Insurance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-01-10· cited 28×
• Jones v. Foster
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-12-13· cited 12×
• Falcon v. Ink's Firestone of Monroe
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-01-13· cited 1×
• Chisley v. Coleman
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2007-12-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stobart v. State Through DOTD
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-04-12· cited 4,923×
• Francois v. Ybarzabal
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-02-25· cited 48×
• Norton v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-09-03· cited 44×
• Fowler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-08-19· cited 42×
• Perkins v. McDow
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-02-22· cited 33×
• Mercadel v. Tran
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-03-29· cited 19×
• Langston v. Shirley
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-10-30· cited 4×

Other cases named Wade v. Autoland, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Wade v. Autoland, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-10-13
• Wade v. Autoland, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-10-13