Wade Lahar Const. Co. v. McMinn-Echols Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the admission of Hankerson’s redacted statement did not implicate Dunbar in the armed robbery because it did not mention Dunbar’s participation in the armed robbery or otherwise identify him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).