Wade Johnson v. Roy L. Hendricks, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner’s receipt of erroneous advice from counsel regarding the deadline for filing a federal habeas corpus petition did not warrant equitable tolling
• holding that a petitioner's receipt of erroneous advice from counsel regarding the deadline for filing a federal habeas corpus petition did not warrant equitable tolling
• holding that attorney’s mistake in determining date habeas petition is due does not constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of equitable tolling
• holding that while the tolling provision excludes time during which a properly filed state PCR is pending, it does not reset the date from which the one-year limitations period begins to run
• rejecting equitable tolling where petitioner relied on incorrect advice from his state public defender as to when he could file his federal habeas petition
• rejecting the petitioner’s argument that he established “extraordinary circumstances” because he relied upon his attorney’s erroneous advice regarding the expiration of the AEDPA’s statute of limitations.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).